|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-19
Posts: 93,
Visits: 538
|
SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
hello guys
can anyone help me to explain this statistics i know is BAD
| Username | Games Played | Av. Profit | Av. Stake | Av. ROI | Total Profit | Form | Ability /100 | Network | Filter |
|
|---|
| KARI#9 | 1.968 | $0 | $2 | 3% | -$559 | - | 58 | PokerStars | SNG Only | x | | KARI#9 | 2.253 | $0 | $2 | 0% | -$875 | - | 57 | PokerStars |
| x |
THANKS
2011-08-31 15:50 by
MNP GIB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2012-04-23
Posts: 34,
Visits: 220
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
no
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-18
Posts: 59,
Visits: 1 727
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
it says u r a huge fish!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-19
Posts: 93,
Visits: 538
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
sendrik (2011-08-31)
it says u r a huge fish!
haha i know
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-19
Posts: 93,
Visits: 538
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
Antster2 (2011-08-31)
no
lol to your answer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-01-26
Posts: 187,
Visits: 1 011
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
You should probably play more tight and be more aggressive when you do play a hand... If you play single table SNG's you want to steal enough pots to stay alive and tune up the aggression when the amount of players go down (5 or less, just gradually increase the aggression). If you play MTT's it's in a way the same, but instead of players going down you should take your amount of blinds going down to decree your aggression factor.
If you end up a big stack, put pressure on your opponents, but protect your stack as well. You want to stay the big stack and bully your opponents (which they will allow due to money bubble/payjump bubble). However, it is also paramount that you stay a big stack. Basically you want to put a lot of pressure on your opponents without risking too many chips. You do that by putting in raises that don't commit you to the hand, but commits your opponent if he chooses to continue.
Last thing and quite important: POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION!!!!
PS: Position is important, just in case you missed that.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-19
Posts: 93,
Visits: 538
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
Psychorabbit (2011-08-31)
You should probably play more tight and be more aggressive when you do play a hand... If you play single table SNG's you want to steal enough pots to stay alive and tune up the aggression when the amount of players go down (5 or less, just gradually increase the aggression). If you play MTT's it's in a way the same, but instead of players going down you should take your amount of blinds going down to decree your aggression factor.
If you end up a big stack, put pressure on your opponents, but protect your stack as well. You want to stay the big stack and bully your opponents (which they will allow due to money bubble/payjump bubble). However, it is also paramount that you stay a big stack. Basically you want to put a lot of pressure on your opponents without risking too many chips. You do that by putting in raises that don't commit you to the hand, but commits your opponent if he chooses to continue.
Last thing and quite important: POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION, POSITION!!!!
PS: Position is important, just in case you missed that.
BIG BIG THANKS guess there are still good people out there
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2012-02-17
Posts: 441,
Visits: 1 175
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
There is no point in sharing these stats since they are only results, every bad player can have good results just like every good player could have bad results. What you should share is hand historys or stats on the hands you played. Analysing those will be the key to improve your game.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-19
Posts: 650,
Visits: 3 240
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
What the results show here is that you actually are beating the games you play as a rule, but that you are only able to beat the very lowest of buy-ins.
So even though you have a positive ROI, because you have taken shots at high buy in tourneys & SNGs you are showing a loss.
I doubt you have Holdem Manager (or similar) but that would be a good investment as you could then see what hands you are over valuing in the early/mid/late stages and adjust accordingly.
GL
Iccc
2011-08-31 17:25 by
Icccfold
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-18
Posts: 65,
Visits: 3 311
|
RE: SHARCKSCOPE My statistick
DaGier (2011-08-31)
There is no point in sharing these stats since they are only results, every bad player can have good results just like every good player could have bad results. What you should share is hand historys or stats on the hands you played. Analysing those will be the key to improve your game.
+ 1
|