Posted 2012-07-24 19:09
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-03-11
Posts: 454,
Visits: 1 522
|
questions about doj, ftp etc.
hi guys, i still have a lot of questions after the so called black friday:
1) i do a little understand why the doj has the right to bring poker sites to us-court that accept usa-pokerplayers even though those companies are not in the usa. however, i do not understand how the doj can bring non-american companies to an american court because of other things like bank fraud etc. that effectively did not happen in the usa. i would say, the country, in which the componies are, have to concern these problems, but not the usa (e.g. ftp is sitting in ireland, but not usa; so ireland would actually have to deal with this case). and, i do not understand how the doj of usa can even order to freeze non-american money.
2) if ftp's money wouldn't have been frozen, would ftp be solvent today?: being able to pay out the americans, and continuing business in other countries like stars is doing?
2012-07-24 19:20 by
tiger07
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-24 22:01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-01-31
Posts: 53,
Visits: 267
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
WCS064 (2012-07-24) 1) They were indicted/charged with various types of bank fraud. UIGEA was passed in 06, enacted in 08 and made it illegal to process any online gaming transaction. FTP was stationed out of the USA, but the fraud they committed still took place right in the USA. They illegally took money from and paid out customers from every single state in the USA. If they are taking money from and paying US customers, how is that not taking place in the USA? They even talked banks (in the USA) into helping them code the illegal transactions. They did many illegal things in the USA. Agreed, but this still doesn't answer the guy's question. It would have made perfect sense to ban poker in the USA but still leave the site up and running for other countries since it isn't located in the USA. Why did THAT not happen? Why were they able to ban FTP in the entire world.
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 01:07
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-03-11
Posts: 454,
Visits: 1 522
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
WCS064 (2012-07-24)
Don Key (2012-07-24)
WCS064 (2012-07-24) 1) They were indicted/charged with various types of bank fraud. UIGEA was passed in 06, enacted in 08 and made it illegal to process any online gaming transaction. FTP was stationed out of the USA, but the fraud they committed still took place right in the USA. They illegally took money from and paid out customers from every single state in the USA. If they are taking money from and paying US customers, how is that not taking place in the USA? They even talked banks (in the USA) into helping them code the illegal transactions. They did many illegal things in the USA.Agreed, but this still doesn't answer the guy's question. It would have made perfect sense to ban poker in the USA but still leave the site up and running for other countries since it isn't located in the USA. Why did THAT not happen? Why were they able to ban FTP in the entire world. They were not able to ban FTP throughout the entire world. FTP did continue operating outside of the USA after Black Friday. They only stopped operating when the Alderney Gaming commission pulled their license. They had no license and had to shut down and haven't been up since. The DOJ did not, in any way, shut them down throughout the entire world. They had ever right to continue to operate as Stars did. They simply were not able to keep a license to operate. I thought his question was pertaining to how the DOJ has jurisdiction over the crimes and whether or not they actually occurred in the USA. If he was asking about why they stopped operating, they simply had their license pulled because their regulator found out they didn't have a fraction of the player deposit money on hand.
actually i thought before the black friday that ftp was richer than stars because they offered the 500/1k games which were a lot higher than what stars has at maximum to offer till now. but, because they were not rich enough, they could not afford to rebuy a license for their business.
2012-07-25 01:09 by
tiger07
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 05:40
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-03-11
Posts: 454,
Visits: 1 522
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
WCS064 (2012-07-25)
tiger07 (2012-07-25)
WCS064 (2012-07-24)
Don Key (2012-07-24)
WCS064 (2012-07-24) 1) They were indicted/charged with various types of bank fraud. UIGEA was passed in 06, enacted in 08 and made it illegal to process any online gaming transaction. FTP was stationed out of the USA, but the fraud they committed still took place right in the USA. They illegally took money from and paid out customers from every single state in the USA. If they are taking money from and paying US customers, how is that not taking place in the USA? They even talked banks (in the USA) into helping them code the illegal transactions. They did many illegal things in the USA.Agreed, but this still doesn't answer the guy's question. It would have made perfect sense to ban poker in the USA but still leave the site up and running for other countries since it isn't located in the USA. Why did THAT not happen? Why were they able to ban FTP in the entire world. They were not able to ban FTP throughout the entire world. FTP did continue operating outside of the USA after Black Friday. They only stopped operating when the Alderney Gaming commission pulled their license. They had no license and had to shut down and haven't been up since. The DOJ did not, in any way, shut them down throughout the entire world. They had ever right to continue to operate as Stars did. They simply were not able to keep a license to operate. I thought his question was pertaining to how the DOJ has jurisdiction over the crimes and whether or not they actually occurred in the USA. If he was asking about why they stopped operating, they simply had their license pulled because their regulator found out they didn't have a fraction of the player deposit money on hand. actually i thought before the black friday that ftp was richer than stars because they offered the 500/1k games which were a lot higher than what stars has at maximum to offer till now. but, because they were not rich enough, they could not afford to rebuy a license for their business. You thought FTP was richer than Stars because they offered 500/1k games???? I don't understand the logic there at all. According to the DOJ, FTP had roughly 10% of player funds on hand a month before Black Friday and roughly 1% on hand the month after. There is an email that has been made public of Ray Bitar admitting a $5 M "run on the bank" could put them under. Thats him admitting they didn't have $5M bucks when there was $350M sitting in people's FTP accounts at that time. Stars, on the other hand, paid out over $100M to US players in under a month. I had my check in the beginning of May. So when debating the finances of Stars V FTP, you can look at multiple DOJ reports, an email from Ray Bitar himself, the fact that FTP never paid anyone and has no money left, the fact that Stars did pay out over $100M to Americans and kept paying out ROW players efficiently. You can look at all those facts, or you can say FTP had bigger games so they were richer. You can use factual logic directly related to their finances, or use a meter that literally means nothing. What does running big games mean when the players money isn't even accounted for in real money? I don't know what you mean about them trying to re buy their license either. Their license was revoked because the company that issued it did an audit of their books and realized they didn't have the player deposits on hand.
there are 2 facts:
1) big games mean that there are players that play that game, and their huge money is actually on a bank account of the poker room and therefore automatically generates the standard interests for the poker room as long as the players do not cash it out. so, ftp must have made much more cash volume from those high games than stars, since stars highest games of 200/400 are ridiciously low compared to the 500/1k games of ftp.
2) behind stars is only 1 billionaire. behind ftp there is at least 2 billionaires (bitar and ferguson, probably elezra too).
conclusion: ftp actually must be richer than stars.
2012-07-25 05:42 by
tiger07
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 07:35
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-03-11
Posts: 454,
Visits: 1 522
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
WCS064 (2012-07-25) Are you joking?
FACTS-
According to the DOJ, FTP had 10% of the player money on hand BEFORE Black Friday, and 1% after.
According to Ray Bitar himself, FTP had less than $5M on hand a month after Black Friday, with $350M in player accounts.
FTP never made one single payment to an American player after Black Friday.
Stars paid out over $100M in less than a month.
FTP had their licensed revoked because the gaming commission discovered they didn't have player funds on hand, something the DOJ already knew.
Who cares how much money was in the player accounts? Those are just numbers. You don't make interest off of money in player accounts. You make interest off of money in real bank accounts. According to all the factual information available, they never had the player account money covered in real money, not even close. It means nothing.
What the hell are you talking about with the billionaire thing??? Furgeson and Ray Bitar are billionaires???REally??? So they could just easily reach into their pockets and take care of this no problem?
Neither of those guys had any money before starting FTP. We know Ray was paid $40M by FTP and Chris almost $80M. If you know they are billionaires you must know something we don't.
This is seriously the weirdest thread I've ever seen. You asked a question. I took the time to respond to the best of my ability with factual information. Then you just say no, I"m wrong, FTP ran big games so they had the most money.
Black Friday seriously impacted my life and I've spend countless hours reading things pertaining to it. I thought maybe I could help. Clearly you know everything though, sorry for wasting your time.
what i actually wanted to say is that ftp actually should have a lot more money than stars, if they would manage the company well. also i wanted to say that a lot ftp money is gone, it must be on fergusons, bitars etc. bank account. i guess they have much more on their bank accounts than their official loans would imply to have. if these guys would not take this extra huge money out of the company, ftp would be super rich and solvent. but obviously bitar, ferguson etc. are not interested in ftp but themselves.
the problem is of ethical nature. there is no way to prevent that firm owners take their money out of the company and then declare being insolvent. only the owners can decide if they want to act ethically correct or not. we as customers and even the company employees cannot do anything. the only thing we can do is to trust and hope they act well.
2012-07-25 07:41 by
tiger07
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 17:31
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2012-09-30
Posts: 49,
Visits: 63
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
WSC why are you responding when the guy is very obviously just pulling your leg.Appreciate your efforts in being helpful but maybe use some discernment rather than get all excited and over helpful. Now can we get back to talking about BIG COCKS, like all good threads.
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 18:52
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-05-31
Posts: 2 401,
Visits: 4 333
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
hello tiger07
i don't think you understand the concept of how money is maximized in a poker online room. 500/1k stakes are irrelevant.
lets tlk about something interesting and relevant like was mentioned above me! yes, isais huge 25cm 3rd arm, he 1 outed me yesterday really!!! 1 outed me on the river. that 25cm thang went in so deep it popped out of my mouth and looked like a anaconda coming out of my mouth.
piece.
2012-07-25 18:52 by
OMGitsViktor
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 20:02
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2012-09-30
Posts: 49,
Visits: 63
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
more **** posts, nice!is 25cm a lot for you?
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 20:04
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-03-11
Posts: 454,
Visits: 1 522
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
WCS064 (2012-07-25) So, your point is that if the company was run in an entirely different way then FTP would possibly be more profitable/have more money than Stars?
Why even say that? It's totally irrelevant. Sure, if it was run perfectly instead of the worst way possible, it might have been a better company. You could say that about any failed company. If thats your only point, I guess I agree, I just don't see why you even feel the need to say it.
Fwiw, the DOJ has made public the amounts that were transferred from the shareholders bank accounts from the FTP accounts. They had to track dozens of bank accounts over years to get this info. You may not believe any of it, but I believe their numbers are accurate. The numbers say Ray got about $40M, Howard about $40M, and Chris about $80M.
They were paying themselves exorbitant amounts of money, but it doesn't seem thats the only reason they were insolvent. They spent as much ad money as Stars despite having half the traffic, they made a huge push after UIGEA when Party Poker left the US market. Instead of using company/investor money to fund their huge ad budget (that includes all the TV shows, etc) they were just using player money. There were threads on 2p2 as far back as 2009 where people w/ inside knowledge were claiming they were using player money for ad buys.
Mike Matusow said on QJ that the plan was always to take the company public. If they were able to do that, they would have been able to inject a ton of public investor money into the company and it wouldn't be insolvent anymore. I highly doubt the plan was just to **** everybody over, but running an insolvent poker site in an illegal market w/ hopes of it going public is a terribly risky move.
but bitar, lederer and ferguson assume its a legal market. there is no court till now, that judged that it was illegal.
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-07-25 20:14
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2012-09-30
Posts: 49,
Visits: 63
|
RE: questions about doj, ftp etc.
wouldn't have got past due diligence to go public.let's all answer more of tigers wind up q's.
|
|
|
|