Posted 2012-11-19 18:03
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-08
Posts: 174,
Visits: 594
|
Can anyone fill me in on why FTP is raking 50cents per hand in sky ****in high limits while at 100/200 on stars they are taking $5 per hand.
This **** really baffles me, specially as I pay more per hand at 25 or 50nl where the house ends up with a whole fukin buy in after a couple hundred hands.
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 18:07
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-18
Posts: 14,
Visits: 1 689
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
hu games maybe?
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 18:24
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-13
Posts: 773,
Visits: 1 824
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
mates rates
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 19:56
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last login: 2013-06-18
Posts: 536,
Visits: 1 934
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
$0.5 max rake per hand at FTP is only for heads up tables, FTP rakes more than at non-head up tables. Stars is the same, but most of their high-stakes games aren't at heads up tables, partly because they don't have them above $50/100.
But yes, their ring-game rake at high-stakes is still more, because they changed the structure of it at the start of 2012.
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 20:03
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-18
Posts: 1 010,
Visits: 6 953
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
OMGTIMDWAN (2012-11-19)
Can anyone fill me in on why FTP is raking 50cents per hand in sky ****in high limits while at 100/200 on stars they are taking $5 per hand. This **** really baffles me, specially as I pay more per hand at 25 or 50nl where the house ends up with a whole fukin buy in after a couple hundred hands. 
Yesterday i saw FTP rake taking $3 for the same limit instead of $5 on Stars and .50 HU on FTP and $3 rake for HU on Stars at 100/200
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 20:44
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-18
Posts: 371,
Visits: 3 396
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
REYMARTZ (2012-11-19)
OMGTIMDWAN (2012-11-19)
Can anyone fill me in on why FTP is raking 50cents per hand in sky ****in high limits while at 100/200 on stars they are taking $5 per hand. This **** really baffles me, specially as I pay more per hand at 25 or 50nl where the house ends up with a whole fukin buy in after a couple hundred hands.  Yesterday i saw FTP rake taking $3 for the same limit instead of $5 on Stars and .50 HU on FTP and $3 rake for HU on Stars at 100/200
there are no 100/200 HU tables at stars.......
2012-11-19 20:49 by
janni
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 21:04
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-04-12
Posts: 30,
Visits: 1 309
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
RunAwesome (2012-11-19) $0.5 max rake per hand at FTP is only for heads up tables, FTP rakes more than at non-head up tables. Stars is the same, but most of their high-stakes games aren't at heads up tables, partly because they don't have them above $50/100. But yes, their ring-game rake at high-stakes is still more, because they changed the structure of it at the start of 2012.
This used to be true but both sites now charge same rate if only 2 players are dealt into the hand regardless if table is heads up or bigger table.
details of rake on both sites: FTP: http://w.fulltiltpoker.com/rake.php Stars: http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/room/rake/
I am not sure if FTP rake has been changed from the takeover or not. It and hard to know exactly which site is best as stars % is a bit lower but FTP pay weekly rakeback through edge rewards and has a lower cap at high stakes but if you play 3/6 or lower full ring stars cap is lower. Both charge far too much!!
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 21:15
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-18
Posts: 1 010,
Visits: 6 953
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
janni (2012-11-19)
REYMARTZ (2012-11-19)
OMGTIMDWAN (2012-11-19)
Can anyone fill me in on why FTP is raking 50cents per hand in sky ****in high limits while at 100/200 on stars they are taking $5 per hand. This **** really baffles me, specially as I pay more per hand at 25 or 50nl where the house ends up with a whole fukin buy in after a couple hundred hands.  Yesterday i saw FTP rake taking $3 for the same limit instead of $5 on Stars and .50 HU on FTP and $3 rake for HU on Stars at 100/200 there are no 100/200 HU tables at stars.......
Meaning when two players are heads up at a six max table
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 21:19
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-06-18
Posts: 371,
Visits: 3 396
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
chesster (2012-11-19)
RunAwesome (2012-11-19) $0.5 max rake per hand at FTP is only for heads up tables, FTP rakes more than at non-head up tables. Stars is the same, but most of their high-stakes games aren't at heads up tables, partly because they don't have them above $50/100. But yes, their ring-game rake at high-stakes is still more, because they changed the structure of it at the start of 2012.This used to be true but both sites now charge same rate if only 2 players are dealt into the hand regardless if table is heads up or bigger table. details of rake on both sites: FTP: http://w.fulltiltpoker.com/rake.phpStars: http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/room/rake/I am not sure if FTP rake has been changed from the takeover or not. It and hard to know exactly which site is best as stars % is a bit lower but FTP pay weekly rakeback through edge rewards and has a lower cap at high stakes but if you play 3/6 or lower full ring stars cap is lower. Both charge far too much!!
i played once in a casino in germany. cashgame. and they took 5 dollars rake for every 100 dollar pot we played......
at stars they take 3 dollars at a 20 000 dollar pot in FLO 1000/2000......
|
|
|
|
Posted 2012-11-19 21:27
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last login: 2013-04-12
Posts: 30,
Visits: 1 309
|
RE: FTP and Pokerstars Rake
janni (2012-11-19)
chesster (2012-11-19)
RunAwesome (2012-11-19) $0.5 max rake per hand at FTP is only for heads up tables, FTP rakes more than at non-head up tables. Stars is the same, but most of their high-stakes games aren't at heads up tables, partly because they don't have them above $50/100. But yes, their ring-game rake at high-stakes is still more, because they changed the structure of it at the start of 2012.This used to be true but both sites now charge same rate if only 2 players are dealt into the hand regardless if table is heads up or bigger table. details of rake on both sites: FTP: http://w.fulltiltpoker.com/rake.phpStars: http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/room/rake/I am not sure if FTP rake has been changed from the takeover or not. It and hard to know exactly which site is best as stars % is a bit lower but FTP pay weekly rakeback through edge rewards and has a lower cap at high stakes but if you play 3/6 or lower full ring stars cap is lower. Both charge far too much!! i played once in a casino in germany. cashgame. and they took 5 dollars rake for every 100 dollar pot we played...... at stars they take 3 dollars at a 20 000 dollar pot in FLO 1000/2000......
I find it strange that they were playing for dollars in Germany! Should a poker site be charging equal rates as a live casino? They dont have to pay to keep you warm and comfortable or pay dealers, waitresses security etc. online rake should be much lower than live casino!
|
|
|
|