|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-07-28 20:48:49
Posts: 3,
Visits: 6
|
|
| OK. I get it. These guys are huge players. I have a few questions. Is it all their money or does the website kick in a piece?...or are they partners with the site? What happens if they run bad and tap out? Then what? They start all over from $1-2 PLO Omaha or get someone to back them. Seems like the money they're playing is a little unreal.
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-08-14 21:59:26
Posts: 93,
Visits: 113
|
|
| I assume this is a retorical question..... great first post though.
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-07-28 20:48:49
Posts: 3,
Visits: 6
|
|
| Question: What is the financial arrangement between a pro player and FTP? How does it differ between different pros like: Ivey, Hansen, Dwan. Do they just play on the site? Does the site back the pros in any way, shape or form? It would make sense for the site to give them a credit line for a piec of the action. Don't know if anyone outside of a n elite circle would have this information or care to share it.
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-08-14 21:59:26
Posts: 93,
Visits: 113
|
|
| They just deposit money in Full Tilt like normal people. It's not like a casino with credit lines for the whales you donkey. The Full Tilt pro's (like Brandon Adams, or Chip Jett for example) get 100% rakeback and an x amount to buy into live tournaments. Team Full Tilt (with the likes of Ivey, Matusow, Lederer etc.) also get a share of the profits of the site which can run into hundreds of thousands a year (if not more). Now please contribute something to this forum and quite making posts with retarded questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-08-20 14:53:24
Posts: 19,
Visits: 179
|
|
FTP pros ( the Players named in red, but not a partner like Ivey, Antonius etc) like Townsend, gets 100% Rakeback and some dollars pr hour, I dont remember how many $ pr h, but it was something like 20 dollar or w/e.
dont Raise without an ace !
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-08-20 14:53:24
Posts: 19,
Visits: 179
|
|
Edit: what Cardplayer said.. Couldnt edit my own Post..
dont Raise without an ace !
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-08-20 20:33:24
Posts: 2,
Visits: 49
|
|
| I dont think its a retarded question - actually I think its a good question.
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2008-08-20 14:53:24
Posts: 19,
Visits: 179
|
|
Jujuman (2008-07-22)
I dont think its a retarded question - actually I think its a good question.
The First question is kinda, non good..
And I can feel CardPlayers frustration, I bet he Megatilted when he wrote it, and lost 66% of his roll taking shot at 500- 1K vs Ivey..
If a Pro busts, he: A) realises the games are changing and go play live..
B) was running superbad and get some stake.
C) Redeposits cuz he wasnt a fking tard who kept all his money online so he could tilt it away.
D) all the above, or something else,
dont Raise without an ace !
|
|
|
| | |