Read the latest tweets by Brian Hastings. Each new tweet will be picked up by this page. Brian Hastings tweets under the alias @brianchastings on Twitter. Check the high stakes twitter-feed for more poker twitter.
Chopped the @sugarhousepoker 100k heads up for $28,467! Put on a dazzling display of disgustingness! #teamhorror
RT @WOCPoker: FT @sugarhousepoker $100K SRC is set w/ @MotherCrusherAP @MattGlantz @adamlevitan @brianchastings @itschrisnow. https://t.co/…
RT @Sonya_Siren: Rocky! ???????? @brianchastings https://t.co/kiIaFCaXE1
@benlegg84 @Mullbucketzz wow hell yeah!!
@Sonya_Siren no babe!
@The_Gildz 5800*P(UNC beats SYR)*P(NOVA beats OKLA)*P(UNC beats NOVA). Nova is about -128 in semis and UNC about -450 so ~56% and 82% there
@The_Gildz what are all the scenarios? You just need UNC to beat Nova in final or you get 0?
@Edichka1 nah, not a good enough player to make high hands. I've never won one!
@geeegeee69 I just mean I'm not sure who's coaching. My decision is mainly personal
@geeegeee69 not coaching at the moment or sure of the market really
RT @shawnbuchanan1: Roman's power chair fund https://t.co/b529vxfaKY via @gofundme
RT @haralabob: Never in my life did I think I’d see a shot chart like this. Steph is the real robot. https://t.co/DkwjEAP0Pi
RT @Sonya_Siren: thanks for hooking us up @DraftKings! Go @Sixers ?? @brianchastings https://t.co/Dg0S1Jl01D
@itschrisnow I will sometime!
@gmoneynquote I'm not sure exactly but I'd guess somewhere around 100 buyins should be sufficient. More conservative could be better though
@quazzy2 several reasons. Playing smaller for now for one thing
@MattGlantz @TheReader23 @sugarhousepoker that too
@TheReader23 @MattGlantz @sugarhousepoker I'm known as the Ultimate Horror Show, Glantz loves spreading the horror.
Playing the @MattGlantz open @sugarhousepoker #horroreverywhere
@SuddenlyBryce yeah sorry
RT @Sonya_Siren: Merry Christmas swag ?? @brianchastings https://t.co/HxXcTGeyUS
Needed 1 more point from Prater to advance to fantasy league finals ??
@xKillerKenx just DM here
She's really cleaning up today! @ Steve's Prince of Steaks https://t.co/zij3SfR9UW
PA House to vote on Internet Poker! https://t.co/yJ9z74mtGe
RT @Sonya_Siren: full belly and a DVR full of Jeopardy! with @brianchastings #MyKindaSaturdayNight
RT @RealMapPoker: Fun $1-2/$1-2 NLHE game @IsleCasinoPP Great action. NO cell phones. Poker thats not boring. #winner #poker #fun https://t…
Sad news about Scott Weiland's death. One of the premier voices in grunge. RIP
@BigHuni @realcharder30 much different for a high volume MTT player than a cash game player though. makes more sense in your situation
@BigHuni in any event, I'm using self-exclusion option for makeup stakes going forward. risk/reward so poor for backers in most cases
@BigHuni @realcharder30 I assume most people are backed because they are unable or unwilling to put up their own money
@ElliotRoe1 @plenopads just makes it a total mathematical disaster for a backer to ever end a stake in makeup. need to be super selective
@ElliotRoe1 @plenopads that mechanic makes staking even more unattractive. if that's the norm, no wonder I'm always advised to stay away
@ElliotRoe1 @plenopads and in other scenario if stake ends in makeup horse ends up with backer's money
@ElliotRoe1 @plenopads how is the backer free rolling the horse? Only if backer stiffs horse for what is clearly owed, right?
@plenopads it'd surprise me for that to be the default. Obviously stating when profits are disbursed prior to beginning stake is the play
@bfauver1 if stake ends in makeup (horse fails to profit on stake) then backer loses money
@bfauver1 yeah that's how 50/50 makeup stakes work. backer takes on all the risk. horse does the work and gets 50% longterm profits
@stealthmunk with the aim of never falling into makeup? otherwise 50/50 doesn't really mean 50/50. horse would get more
@stealthmunk @CompleteDonk @GSinishtaj I thought I was done lol. Couldn't help myself. Need a self-exclusion button
@arobinson11 @Adambitker @RyanTYFL I don't think length matters really. Settle up terms do but absent of any terms there seems insane
@Adambitker @RyanTYFL that just seems insane to me. backer can't profit unless horse wins like 80% of sessions...
@cuntycakes123 I thought I did. Learn something new every day! I'm seriously curious what your answer is.
50/50 makeup stake. Horse wins $5k session 1, loses $8k session 2. What is current makeup figure? Does horse pocket any money?
RT @Sonya_Siren: wine down Wednesday with bae @brianchastings https://t.co/VwKarbkcJa
RT @killfatmike: @brianchastings Poker player friend of mine runs this - can I get a retweet for great cause? https://t.co/0HKRub2Ff4